Civil Rights Essays - Counterculture Of The 1960s,

Civil Rights The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in his book Why We Can't Wait, quite correctly named the civil rights struggles of the mid-twentieth century the Third American Revolution. Though it is most often attributed to the 1960s the civil rights movement found it's start in the decade before that, the ?peaceful 50s'. The civil rights movement actually started with legal battles before moving into the streets of American cities. The Supreme Court ordered the desegregation of schools with ?all deliberate speed? and overturned it's former ?separate but equal? policy that had for so long been the law of the land. This led to the tokenism that MLK decried in his book, and it also led to the realization that there wouldn't be equal rights gained through the courts alone, they had to take their struggle to the streets. The NAACP and other organizations continued their struggle with the judicial system, but new organizations formed to help the people in a different way. It was in this time when the SLCC and SNCC were formed to fight, rather to not fight, for equality. Non-violence was the core of the ?mainstream? movement and it was their main weapon. From the bus boycotts of Montgomery to the lunch counter sit-ins across the nation not a black fist was raised in anger. They were beaten, spat upon and cursed and still did not fight back. This was a brilliant public relations strategy in action, for every time the protestors were shown on the news, it was them acting peacefully and a white mob attacking them. These images alone helped to win over many supporters and force the national government to step in to help the cause of civil rights. One of the main goals of the passive resistors was to gain public support and force the government to uphold the Supreme Courts controversial rulings, such as what happened with Central High School when President Kennedy nationalized the Arkansas National Guard and the Interstate Commerce Comm. forced the desegreg ation of the interstate bus lines. Without lifting a finger they changed the way the nation was run. As the years went on African Americans became even more willing to stand up for their rights, to the point where MLK led a march on Washington D.C. Slowly but surely the small pocket of ?dissidents? turned into a nationwide movement that reshaped the way the constitution was interpreted and tried to help make sure that all men really were created equal. Even the killings of important persons like MLK, Medgar Evars, and Malcolm X couldn't stop the flow once it had been released. The men became martyrs to the cause and more powerful than they ever were when they were alive. Ultimately the goals of the civil rights movement were quite simple. They wanted to end discrimination, to become accepted as American citizens with all the rights, duties and privileges that entails. They wanted the power to become whatever they wanted in life, to not be held back by mere melatonin but instead be accepted everywhere by everyone as a fellow human being, regardless of race. Bibliography: Why We Can't Wait - Martin Luther King Jr.

Healthy Truckers Go the Extra Mile!

Healthy Truckers Go the Extra Mile! If you’re a trucker who’s serious about your career, make sure you think about ways to maintain a healthy lifestyle- both in and out of the driver’s seat. Do you own a trucking company or are part of a company’s management team? Consider implementing a driver wellness plan. Healthy drivers will help minimize staff retention challenges and make open positions on your team more attractive to newer, younger drivers. Driver wellness programs are growing in popularity across the country and for good reason- they help prevent illness, boost productivity, and enhance life satisfaction. Healthy drivers are happier, better employees who stay at their jobs longer. They also help reverse the trend of increasing trucker turnover, a problem that has burdened the industry for the past few years as older truckers are retiring and aren’t being replaced by new drivers.What are the reasons behind this trend? For many, these jobs, with tough, unhealthy working conditi ons and limited opportunities, aren’t as appealing as they once were. But thoughtful, well-designed wellness programs can help offset some of these unappealing aspects of truck driving.In order for driver wellness programs to have a deep and lasting impact, they need to be proactive in their efforts to work with drivers, and should be thoroughly holistic, addressing all major dimensions of wellness:Physical: proper nutrition, exercise, and lifestyle choicesEmotional: promoting emotional healthIntellectual: strategies for sound mental health and developmentOccupational: creating true job satisfactionSocial: forging meaningful community connectionsSpiritual: creating and following a meaningful set of guiding valuesHere’s the bottom line: Trucking companies should make sincere and measurable efforts to support the wellness of their drivers, and when drivers make health and wellness an important part of their lives, everyone benefits.Why Wellness in Trucking Needs to Go th e Extra MileRead More at Supply Chain Management Review

Business Decision Document and Evaluation Assignment

Business Decision Document and Evaluation - Assignment Example This is based upon a number of ethical considerations and leadership and "business scorecard" approaches to decision making which have taken into account all the exogenous and internal factors present here which should ultimately affect the bidding contract and the willingness of the stakeholders to participate in an activity which is profitable and ethical. 3. In my advice I have taken into account the special consideration of being able to foresee arrangements under the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) where the Hospital will be subsequently leased to the public sector/NHS.I have been made aware of the strong preference of our investment partners as to the presence of a single hospital serving the entire district in the interests of attracting specialists and for better economies of scale. However it has to be understood that the transport links across the district are not good with very poor bus services particular from and to the east side of the district. Overall it will be a better decision to have to more than one hospital. In the absence of that initiative then it is better to decide upon a site that has better access to transport and fewer access problems. The decision document and its relevant considerations 4. Poor transport linking is the obvious problem with Site A (Old Colliery) which is a disused mining site situated in the east of the district. This is because it has been stated that the transport links are poor. This may be an economical site due to the low quality environment and the availability of cheap labour however this may not be worth the ethical issues which would arise due to the doubts as to health issues here. I have been made aware of the unconfirmed rumours that part of the site was used at one time as a hazardous chemical dump and the unhealthy environment around the site which lacks greenery for the safety of the patients. 5. Coming to Site B (Dams Nature Reserve) I have been made aware that the site has the advantage of being accessible and acceptable for the residence of the professional staff. However I have also been made aware of the fact that the nature reserve itself has been declared a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) due to the presence of Great Crested Newts in some of the ponds and wetlands. I have also been told about the "Newts" and the financial strategy being offered to rid of these "Newts" with the involvement of the local area authority. However based on my personal ethics and professional values I would strongly oppose such a measure and although I would have chosen this site for what it offers I cannot approve of the means of procuring it. 6. The third site is the Site C: (Derelict Woolen Mill Complex) which is my primary choice for this hospital(s)l. This is primarily due its good motorway access here and the reasonable accommodation rates so the place does not become unaffordable for the poor patients converted into apartments. The only problem should be parking and further

The merger between two health care systems Research Paper

The merger between two health care systems - Research Paper Example management overlooked potential distrust from local care providers, it also did not focus on the overall inefficiencies as well as the market forces that come about during a merger. Furthermore, the new entity did not have cost-saving skills needed to keep the company a float after the merger; they combined this with poor cultural knowledge and team leadership needed to deal with losers and winners in the arrangement. Pennsylvania witnessed what could potentially be their largest health system yet in the 7th month of 1997 through the creation of Penn State Geisinger Health System. At first, the new unit now had 1342 beds, 1000 physicians, 77 outpatient clinics, 3 hospitals, 1 drug treatment facility as well as patients from about 40 counties in central Pennsylvania (Sidorov, 2003). During the formation process, the two former organizations needed to decide upon executive leadership, so they came up with a methodology for creation of a new board. They took a 50-50 split between board members from both health systems; however, Geisinger got the upper hand in this regard because its representative was the chairperson. He had the power to break ties during votes and he contributed towards a higher ratio of members from his own company; this implies that executive decisions were now skewed towards the chairperson’s former organization. Not all the aspects of the two companies were dissolved as Pen State Hershey would be retaining control of the college of Medicine that was under Hershey Medical Center. Several changes took place throughout the organization; for instance, the Health Plan under Geisinger now became a joint plan whose name accommodated the new change. This had the advantage of increasing the customer base to about a million for the HMO and expanded the geographic regions from which consumers came. The merged unit still maintained the regional demarcations that had been used by Geisinger, and only added Penn state HMC as a forth region which would

Aboriginal title on the lands of Canada Essay Example for Free

Aboriginal title on the lands of Canada Essay Aboriginal title on the lands of Canada is a complex issue today. The question is that these peoples settled on the land much earlier than did the residents from Great Britain and Europe on the whole. It is quite fair to leave after Aboriginal unity of people the lands which were occupied by their predecessors. The basic element in this issue concerning people’s rights is to save social equilibrium in the Canadian society. Thus, there should be an explicit estimation of policies and agencies maintained through the Supreme Court in British Columbia and Ontario as well as in other states and provinces of the country. See more: Foot Binding In China essay This makes a controversy between the First Nations and current residents in applying policies grounded on the Constitution and some other laws and acts which attempt to break down the peaceful resolution of the situation with land claims. Everything which touches upon the law field of relationships between individuals should be weighed lawfully. What is more, large social groups should correspond to the norms of justice and impartiality on the part of the representatives of law. Aboriginal people of Canada seem to be outside the policies and processes which form and establish suchlike policies. Thus, it is unlawful for the majority of Canada to deny the right of Aboriginal communities to have their lands far from being captured, even though Canada is a largely multinational country. To provide arguments for this claim, the paper leads toward thorough investigation of peer-reviewed articles on the topic. On the other hand, it is focused on finding out the optimal decision to work out the problem currently and in the future. Looking at the Delgamuukw decision maintained in 1997 in British Columbia, it is quite clear that the Court could not have an idea on the â€Å"Aboriginal title† and how to govern it insofar (Dacks, 2002). It was, particularly, the only mismatch for the political authorities in order to designate the place of Aboriginal people in Canada. Here comes an opinion that since 1846 when British Columbia became sovereign there were no applicable laws or norms to support those who were already present on the land by the date of European settlement. An expert in this socio-political problem would recognize a set of impediments on the way toward better negotiation on the land claims policies. It is a matter of diplomatic regulatory mechanisms which are beyond disagreement when it comes into such subtle topic for the investigation. Dacks (2002) identified three basic elements encountered in the process of anticipation between province and federal governments and Aboriginal communities in British Columbia, namely: 1) Anticipating the issue between governments and Aboriginal people by dint of litigation; 2) Governments’ limitations on their political mandates; 3) Perceiving the meaning of the title Aboriginal people long for by the governments and settling land claims (243). This would ideally fit the manner and the way for resolving the contradictory points in the debates on the land claims and policing in Canada hitherto. One needs to rally thoughts over the aspect of Aboriginal policy agencies (APA’s) which are distinctly vital to maintain dialogue in the ambivalence in terms of governments and indigenous people (Malloy, 2001). This matter is open for the discussion today, but leaves more rights and jurisdiction after the governments. According to the Constitution Act, 1867 leaving provinces space for â€Å"Indians and land reserved for the Indians,† everything seems clear and lawfully (Malloy, 2001, p. 131). However, the litigation as for the current land claims policies needs some cornerstone amendments. It is especially vital to provide indigenous people with a democratic direction in working out their place â€Å"under the sun. † On the local level, provincial governments established in British Columbia and in Ontario are stated to be unexamined on the constitutional and jurisdiction level. Hence, it becomes hard for Aboriginal communities to realize and come closer to their own rights as of their title. APA’s serve two main function in this complicated dialogue on the political level, namely: 1. Internal regulations of Aboriginal policy in terms of the provincial governments; 2. External anticipation and cooperation with First Nations (Malloy, 2001). However, even if taking into account suchlike extrapolation of Aboriginal rights, it is still unclear where the law securing indigenous people comes into effect. This is another mismatch to be put into the picture by now. In the aforementioned ambivalence of functions prescribed to APA’s one should figure out a distinct set of actors for the Aboriginal communities. It is even more distinct than among the governments who take a glance more at the employers, unions, etc. Aboriginal people are likely to negotiate with different actors on the external dimension as long as they can reach out more support thereafter. This makes APA’s different. Moreover, it assumes more governance on their lands despite the constitutional norms adopted beforehand. White (2002) provides the authority of treaty federalism in Northern Canada, as the prerequisite which gave Aboriginal people to establish their unique governance institutions outside the federal and provincial verification and coverage. This claim has plenty to talk about, as it sparks special concerns among Canadian politics today. However, every bean has its black, as they say. The idea is that indigenous people in Canada are hardly considered to be fulfilled with rights and obligations. It is better to say the issue of cultural and traditional coloring in decision-making procedure is still beyond deeper negotiations (White, 2002). Provision of the democratic freedoms played a great role for APA’s in terms of more execution in land claims by Aboriginal people. The point of land possession is partially solved, as might be seen now. However, the Aboriginal self-government promotes a collision with the public government (White, 2002). It is all about the controversy in possessing rights, territory, and holding office. Aboriginal people tend to be the only office holders on their historic lands, while the public governance presupposes such opportunity for all residents. Thus, the intent for the Aboriginal people seems to be quite air now. Speaking in a historical way, there was a treaty signed by the indigenous people with the newcomers represented by British and Canadian elite. Thus, indigenous people would never give their lands without a thoughtful implication of their own hopes and pretences. Hence, since 1970s a new round of negotiations between Canadian governments and Aboriginal communities aims at making â€Å"comprehensive land claims† available and warranted lawfully for the indigenous layer of the Canadian society. The main constructive suggestion for the Canadian political elite is to invent the most rational way to reach a compromise. It is a complicated issue that needs more attention on the part of all social groups and communities in Canada. It is not about involving the World Community in this internal issue of Canadian government, but, perhaps, it considers consultations or pieces of advice on the part of the United States, for instance. The Aboriginal property rights are largely violated in almost all aspects (Avio, 1994). However, the largest part of suchlike violation falls into the cultural features. The environmental issues as well as the political ones are highlighted to be broken down among the society. Thus, it cannot but make the aboriginal communities lose their temper. Turning back to the Delgamuukw litigation process, Dacks (2002) draws the interim measures for the aboriginal leaders, as benefits provided on the part of the social majority. Several agreements on the participation of indigenous people in such areas as forest management, tourism marketing, training, and some other prerogatives for the First Nations were established in British Columbia (Dacks, 2002). This was a real breakthrough for those who struggle for their rights. Amending some acts and norms of Canadian law system, the representatives of justice were provided constructive decisions on the issue of Aboriginal part in land claims policy: The R. v. Sparrow and R. v. Van der Peet decisions of the Supreme court established the principle that governments can infringe upon Aboriginal rights if such infringements are justifiable, and identified a test for determining if they are justifiable in individual cases (Dacks, 2002, p. 245). Still, the issue of justifiable features in providing lawful initiatives is vague in its meaning. It does not give detailed insights on whether or not Aboriginal people are secured in their property rights and everything which belongs to the territorial and cultural implications. The Aboriginal communities are really diverse in their character. They need special, unique, approach to identify a set of issues to be solved in their claims for lands. It is impossible to separate these critical issues into pieces according to the extent of their significance. Politics and sociologists have taken it into account recently. The only thing is that Aboriginal tribal communities should be discussed and evaluated as historically sovereign territorial-administrative units on the Canadian lands. This is why the issue of APA’s is that complicated currently. Actors and networks in the social domain are now critical for the indigenous people in Canada. Malloy (2001) outlines in this respect the following statement: â€Å"Provincial-Aboriginal interactions comprise two major policy communities: social policy and economic/resource policy† (138). This is why there is no ground to talk about renovations in policing for Aboriginal people, unless there are appropriate agreements on budget assets and duration of such agreements, in particular. To be more precise, since 1973, the Crown and Aboriginal people have finished 22 contemporary treaties (Alcantara, 2007). Thus, it is just the matter of time and cohesion of the provincial and federal governments to the problems of Aboriginal people. However, the thing is that not all indigenous groups in Canada are solid and united in their claims for political and administrative incentives. The question is that there are some contradictions within Aboriginal tribes. Thus, since 1970s, some of the Aboriginal peoples who were involved into the process of comprehensive land claims were not able to fulfill the treaties (Alcantara, 2007). By contrast, Canadian politics still have not enough willingness and, say, powers to single out the most appropriate consensual implication. Coming from the times when indigenous people were considered as the barbarous aliens, such alienation in the Canadian society seems to be taken for granted. It makes no point in making compromises or political steps forward a democratic way of negotiating with such unique layers of the society. Avio (1994) remarkably identifies a line on which contradiction appears: â€Å"Since all aboriginal rights are alienable to the Crown via mutual agreement, those contracts which wholly or partly convert a food fish entitlement to a commercial entitlement must be constitutionally permissible per se† (424). As there are no such permissions yet, the conflict or litigation is in evidence. To make up such issues as self-government provision, taxation policies, economical growth and some other among the Aboriginal territorial unities, Canadian provincial and federal governments should adopt some basically vital agreements. Interestingly, such policies drive two governments to making additional autonomies on the territorial-administrative political map of the country. Supposedly, it interrupts politics to be more intensive in the socio-political process with indigenous people. On the other hand, Canadians do not elaborate on the experience of other countries where suchlike problem took place or currently is in evidence. In addition, another single obstacle in the process of negotiations is that federal and provincial powers do not take indigenous people possibility to vote or participate in the process on the equal basis. The process itself is said to represent â€Å"an advanced form of control, manipulation, and assimilation† (Alcantara, 2007, p. 348). In turn it leads toward consideration of majority-minority relationships with larger emphasis on the opinion of the majority only. It comes out to be that Canadian provincial governments under the pressure of the top politics in the federal government are likely to propose an alternative for the indigenous people. The idea is that self-government form of governance seems no longer possible for the jurisdiction and economical relationships internally. Thus, interim measures could be just like a â€Å"veil† on the face of Aboriginal people. Claims-mandated boards were supposed to work out the problem by implementing them, as â€Å"institutions of public governance† on the historically Aboriginal territories (White, 2002, p. 94). Once again, it brings the overall climate of negotiations toward nothing. To say more, it renders null all attempts to make an â€Å"equal† consensus visible and applicable to the situations. On the other side, the above mentioned proposal on the part of the governments is aimed at reducing the controversy among different tribes. To conclude, the process of treaties between Canadian majority and Aboriginal minorities is still in process. Thus, it is unlawful for the majority of Canada to deny the right of Aboriginal communities to have their lands far from being captured, even though Canada is a largely multinational country. There are still little achievements in the issue of Aboriginal property rights. Moreover, the situation is aggravated by the differences in ambitions of provincial and federal governments posed on the lands occupied by the Indians. On the other side, Aboriginal minorities need to be deeply evaluated as of their pretences (land claims) individually in each province and in each state as well. Until these issues are not solved, there is no agreement as of warrants for comprehensive land claims in Canada for the indigenous minorities. Reference Alcantara, C. (2007). To Treaty or Not to Treaty? Aboriginal Peoples and Comprehensive Land Claims Negotiations in Canada. Publius: TheJournal of Federalism , 38 (2), 343-369. Avio, K. L. (1994). Aboriginal Property Rights in Canada: A Contractarian Interpretation of R. v. Sparrow. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques , 20 (4), 415-429. Dacks, G. (2002). British Columbia after the Delgamuukw Decision: Land Claims and Other Processes. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques , 28 (2), 239-255. Malloy, J. (2001). Double Identities: Aboriginal Policy Agencies in Ontario and British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique , 34 (1), 131-155. White, G. (2002). Treaty Federalism in Northern Canada: Aboriginal-Government Land Claims Boards. Publius , 32 (3), 89-114.

Pearl S. Buck - A Modern Day Hero Essay -- essays research papers

Pearl S. Buck - A Modern Day Hero Introduction A friend of mine gave me a copy of The Good Earth as a birthday gift. Until then, I had never heard of the literary masterpiece or the author, Pearl S. Buck. The story captivated me. I found myself engrossed in the story of the poor farmer Wang Lung whose love for his land allowed him to overcome many odds including famine, flood and a revolution. Through hard work and dedication, Wang Lung became one of the wealthiest landowners in the Anweih province of China. Sadly, Wang Lung’s two sons did not share his passion for â€Å"the good earth† and cared only for their bequest. Wang Lung was still on his death bed when the two sons decided that as soon as their father died, they would sell the land and split their inheritance (Buck, P.S., 1931). The Good Earth instantly became one of my favorite books and Pearl S. Buck, one of my favorite authors. Peter Conn wrote the introduction of the book in the form of a short biography of the author. I usually do not read the introductions until after I read the story because I never want other people’s review to influence my own opinion of the book. So, I saved the introductory pages for last. It wasn’t until I read of Pearl S. Buck’s memoirs that I began to truly admire her, not only for her writing but for her humanitarian and altruistic contributions. Who is Pearl S. Buck? Pearl Sydenstricker was born in Hillsboro, West Virginia in 1892. Her missionary parents, Absalom and Carrie Sydenstricker brought her to China when she was three months old. By the time she was four, she spoke and wrote Chinese as well as English (Conn, NDA). She was at first educated by her mother and tutored by a Chinese Confucian Scholar (Author’s Calendar, 2002). While her parents carried out their Christian mission all over the Chinkiang province of China, Pearl was left under the care of her â€Å"amah† or governess. It was her amah that fascinated her with Chinese folklores and mythical tales of ancient magic, fairies and dragons (Conn, NDA). Growing up, Pearl spent hours wandering the streets of Chinkiang observing how the people lived. She became familiar with their rituals, practices, and traditions. Her first hand experience with the Chinese culture led her to write many novels, including her most critically acclaimed book, The Good Earth. Her intimate knowledge of the Chinese culture was evident in ... ...ca Online: http://www.search.eb.com/eb/article?tocId=9017878 Buck, Pearl S. (1931), The Good Earth, NY: The John Day Company Conn, Peter (NDA), Pearl S. Buck (Introduction: The Good Earth), NY: Simon & Schuster, Inc. Doyle, Paul. A (2000), American National Biography Online: Buck, Pearl S., Retrieved on April 20, 2005 from the World Wide Web: http://www.anb.org/articles/16/16-00214.html Frenz, Horz (1969). The Nobel Lectures, 1901-1967, Amsterdam: Elservier Publishing Company Merriam-Webster Online (NDA). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com on March 9, 2005 PSBI Website (NDA), Pearl S. Buck International Online, Retrieved on April 11, 2005 from the World Wide Web: http://www.pearl-s-buck.org/psbi/ Mythology Themes (2000), Sparknotes Online: Themes in Mythology, Retrieved on April 20, 2005 from the World Wide Web: http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/mythology/themes.html Spencer, Stephen (2002), The Journal of American Popular Culture, Vol. 1, Issue 1: The Discourse of Whiteness: Chinese-American History, Pearl S. Buck and The Good Earth, Retrieved on April 11, 2005 from the World Wide Web: http://www.americanpopularculture.com/journal/articles/spring_2002/spencer.htm

Global Communications Worksheet Essay

Transcribe the following welcome message for the employees from each country: I wanted to welcome you ASAP to our little family here in the States. It’s high time we shook hands in person and not just across the sea. I’m pleased as punch about getting to know you all, and I for one will do my level best to sell you on America. Complete the table below with your transcribed welcome messages. Also indicate whether each of the countries are more individualistic or relationship focused. Country Transcribe Welcome Message Brazil We wanted to welcome you to our family here in the States and thought it high time we shook hands in person and I am excited to get to know all of you and will do my best to sell you on America. Brazil’s culture is generally group-oriented and asserting individual preferences may be viewed as less important than conforming to a groups norms. Building lasting and trusting personal relationships is therefore critically important with Brazilians who generally wish to close any deals with someone with whom they have a strong bond. Russia I want to welcome you as quickly as possible to our little family here in the States. I think it is high time we met in person and not continue business across the sea. I look forward to getting to know all of you, and I will do my best to sell you on America. Those within the Russian culture have long been dominated by like the tsars and the Communist Party leaders. Because of this, many Russians do not have individual freedom and maintain a collectivist set of values. India I wanted to welcome you to our family here in the States and thought it was the right time to shake hands in person rather than do business across the sea. I look forward to getting to know you, and allowing you the opportunity to know us as well, and will do my best at selling you on America. Indian society is that of the collectivism view and it promotes social cohesion as well as interdependence. China I wanted to take a moment and welcome you as part of our family here in the States. I think the time for us to meet and shake hands in person has been long overdue. I look forward to getting to know one another and will do my best at selling you on America. In China, there is a collectivist approach in where the upholding of a stable and â€Å"in-sync† harmonious society is is seen to be the most important part of ethics.